jump to navigation

‘Bad’ history October 16, 2009

Posted by gesta in Academia, Debate.
Tags:
add a comment

No sooner do I launch an incoherent post on ‘impact’ (which in itself illustrates the dangers of such woolly concepts) on an unsuspecting world, than the Times Higher features a lengthy article on Bad History, starring Miri Rubin and Jonathan Phillips amongst some modernists. Although the article isn’t explicitly about impact, historians looking for a crumb of comfort in these vicissitudinous times may be relieved that some people haven’t lost the plot entirely.

(more…)

Impact October 15, 2009

Posted by gesta in Academia, Boundaries, Debate.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

If you keep up with the Higher Education pages in the UK newspapers, you will know that there has been a great deal of comment onĀ  a mysterious entity called ‘impact’ lately. Impact is the latest government and research council buzz word for why our research must have some definable economic or social goal: where is the next technological gadget or government initiative coming from in otherwords. Impact will also replace esteem in the REF, which in itself, replaces the RAE, except with a bigger percentage (more…)